<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Invalidity of Notice for Bounced Cheque Due to Lack of Payment Demand under Negotiable Instruments Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69218</link>
    <description>Dishonour of Cheque - validity of notice issued - as in the notice which was issued after the bouncing of the cheque, there was no demand of the amount of the bounced cheque, in this background, the findings returned by learned Trial Court that the notice was no notice in the eyes of law, as is envisaged under the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, were also correct findings. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:15:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:15:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Invalidity of Notice for Bounced Cheque Due to Lack of Payment Demand under Negotiable Instruments Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69218</link>
      <description>Dishonour of Cheque - validity of notice issued - as in the notice which was issued after the bouncing of the cheque, there was no demand of the amount of the bounced cheque, in this background, the findings returned by learned Trial Court that the notice was no notice in the eyes of law, as is envisaged under the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, were also correct findings. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:15:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>