<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 537 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436511</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Income Tax Settlement Commission&#039;s order, finding no merit in the arguments raised. The Court held that the Settlement Commission had followed the prescribed procedures without procedural or substantive errors. Emphasizing the limited scope of judicial review, the Court concluded that it could not interfere with the settled matter. The miscellaneous applications were closed without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 537 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436511</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Income Tax Settlement Commission&#039;s order, finding no merit in the arguments raised. The Court held that the Settlement Commission had followed the prescribed procedures without procedural or substantive errors. Emphasizing the limited scope of judicial review, the Court concluded that it could not interfere with the settled matter. The miscellaneous applications were closed without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>