<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 528 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436502</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals by the revenue and allowed the appeals by the assessees. The additions based on an unsigned draft agreement to sell, unexplained investments, unexplained expenditure on construction, and cash deposits were all quashed due to lack of evidential value and risk of double taxation. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, emphasizing proper consideration of facts and evidence, leading to the deletion of the additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 528 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436502</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals by the revenue and allowed the appeals by the assessees. The additions based on an unsigned draft agreement to sell, unexplained investments, unexplained expenditure on construction, and cash deposits were all quashed due to lack of evidential value and risk of double taxation. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, emphasizing proper consideration of facts and evidence, leading to the deletion of the additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>