<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 524 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436498</link>
    <description>A subsequent authoritative Supreme Court declaration that interest on land acquisition compensation is not separately taxable, but forms part of compensation, could be applied in rectification proceedings as a mistake apparent from the record. The Assessing Officer&#039;s section 154 rectification granting relief on that basis was therefore valid. Once the rectification correctly reflected the settled legal position, it could not be treated as prejudicial to the Revenue, and revision under section 263 was not sustainable. The CBDT circular relied upon was consistent with that approach, and the Commissioner&#039;s objection that the Assessing Officer had acted beyond jurisdiction was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 524 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436498</link>
      <description>A subsequent authoritative Supreme Court declaration that interest on land acquisition compensation is not separately taxable, but forms part of compensation, could be applied in rectification proceedings as a mistake apparent from the record. The Assessing Officer&#039;s section 154 rectification granting relief on that basis was therefore valid. Once the rectification correctly reflected the settled legal position, it could not be treated as prejudicial to the Revenue, and revision under section 263 was not sustainable. The CBDT circular relied upon was consistent with that approach, and the Commissioner&#039;s objection that the Assessing Officer had acted beyond jurisdiction was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>