<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 523 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436497</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under section 271B was unjustified due to the absence of maintained books of accounts. The additional legal ground challenging the validity of the notice was admitted for adjudication, emphasizing the importance of clear and specific charges in penalty proceedings. The appeal was partly allowed, with the penalty deleted and certain grounds dismissed as not pressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 523 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436497</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under section 271B was unjustified due to the absence of maintained books of accounts. The additional legal ground challenging the validity of the notice was admitted for adjudication, emphasizing the importance of clear and specific charges in penalty proceedings. The appeal was partly allowed, with the penalty deleted and certain grounds dismissed as not pressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>