<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 511 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436485</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the importer&#039;s appeal, directing the Adjudicating Authority to grant a refund of the Special Additional Duty (SAD) for the imported paper cup machines within 45 days with interest. The rejection of part of the refund claim based on a DRI communication was deemed unfounded, as it was not part of the show cause notice. The appellant&#039;s evidence of selling the machines was considered sufficient, and none of their evidence was found to be inaccurate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:01:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 511 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436485</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the importer&#039;s appeal, directing the Adjudicating Authority to grant a refund of the Special Additional Duty (SAD) for the imported paper cup machines within 45 days with interest. The rejection of part of the refund claim based on a DRI communication was deemed unfounded, as it was not part of the show cause notice. The appellant&#039;s evidence of selling the machines was considered sufficient, and none of their evidence was found to be inaccurate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>