https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32425 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the seizure of imported goods by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI). It upheld the legality of the seizure based on intelligence of customs duty evasion through undervaluation. The court found the conditions imposed for provisional release, including executing an indemnity bond and depositing differential duty, to be fair. It emphasized that issues of undervaluation and duty evasion should be determined by the adjudicating authorities, not through writ jurisdiction. The petitioner's arguments were deemed without merit, and the court advised presenting the case before the relevant authorities for resolution. en-us Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32425 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the seizure of imported goods by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI). It upheld the legality of the seizure based on intelligence of customs duty evasion through undervaluation. The court found the conditions imposed for provisional release, including executing an indemnity bond and depositing differential duty, to be fair. It emphasized that issues of undervaluation and duty evasion should be determined by the adjudicating authorities, not through writ jurisdiction. The petitioner's arguments were deemed without merit, and the court advised presenting the case before the relevant authorities for resolution. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32425