<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 499 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436473</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Trial Court&#039;s decision to dismiss the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court found that the notice issued after the dishonor of the cheque lacked a proper demand for payment as required by law. Additionally, the cheque was presented to the payee bank after the six-month validity period, making the drawer criminally liable. The Court ruled in favor of the respondent, dismissing the appeal and vacating any pending applications or interim orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 499 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436473</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Trial Court&#039;s decision to dismiss the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court found that the notice issued after the dishonor of the cheque lacked a proper demand for payment as required by law. Additionally, the cheque was presented to the payee bank after the six-month validity period, making the drawer criminally liable. The Court ruled in favor of the respondent, dismissing the appeal and vacating any pending applications or interim orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>