<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 2076 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307440</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision to cancel penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) for undisclosed income. It found show-cause notices defective as they did not specify the grounds for penalties, following the principles from a Karnataka High Court case. The Tribunal deemed the penalties invalid due to procedural flaws and dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals while deeming the assessee&#039;s Cross Objections infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 2076 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307440</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision to cancel penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) for undisclosed income. It found show-cause notices defective as they did not specify the grounds for penalties, following the principles from a Karnataka High Court case. The Tribunal deemed the penalties invalid due to procedural flaws and dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals while deeming the assessee&#039;s Cross Objections infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>