<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1531 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307447</link>
    <description>Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is confined to narrow statutory grounds and cannot be used to reargue the merits of the original matter. The court found that the application sought to reopen issues already decided rather than show any permissible basis for review, so the review application was not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2023 08:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1531 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307447</link>
      <description>Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is confined to narrow statutory grounds and cannot be used to reargue the merits of the original matter. The court found that the application sought to reopen issues already decided rather than show any permissible basis for review, so the review application was not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>