https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307437 The court upheld the validity of the appointment of the Special Police Officer, ruling that appointment by virtue of office was in accordance with the law. It also found that the investigation complied with the Act, as the special police officer supervised subordinate officers who conducted parts of the investigation. The court held that defects in the investigation process did not invalidate the trial, as they did not cause a miscarriage of justice or prejudice the defense. Consequently, the appellant's conviction and punishment were upheld. en-us Thu, 04 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Apr 2023 17:39:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307437 The court upheld the validity of the appointment of the Special Police Officer, ruling that appointment by virtue of office was in accordance with the law. It also found that the investigation complied with the Act, as the special police officer supervised subordinate officers who conducted parts of the investigation. The court held that defects in the investigation process did not invalidate the trial, as they did not cause a miscarriage of justice or prejudice the defense. Consequently, the appellant's conviction and punishment were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307437