<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 95 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the petition, quashing the order for additional customs duty on imported Zinc skimming. It upheld the petitioner&#039;s argument that if excise duty is not applicable, no countervailing duty can be imposed. The Tribunal directed the Ministry of Finance to investigate the inconsistent conduct of the respondent in passing orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 95 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the petition, quashing the order for additional customs duty on imported Zinc skimming. It upheld the petitioner&#039;s argument that if excise duty is not applicable, no countervailing duty can be imposed. The Tribunal directed the Ministry of Finance to investigate the inconsistent conduct of the respondent in passing orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>