https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307435 The Court found that the termination order was unjust as it was passed without considering the reply to the second show cause notice, violating Article 311 of the Constitution of India. The Court quashed the termination order, remitted the matter for fresh disposal, and directed the payment of 50% of the subsistence allowance deposited in the Court to the petitioner, subject to final accounting. The enquiring authority was instructed to issue a notice to the petitioner before proceeding with the enquiry. en-us Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:12:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307435 The Court found that the termination order was unjust as it was passed without considering the reply to the second show cause notice, violating Article 311 of the Constitution of India. The Court quashed the termination order, remitted the matter for fresh disposal, and directed the payment of 50% of the subsistence allowance deposited in the Court to the petitioner, subject to final accounting. The enquiring authority was instructed to issue a notice to the petitioner before proceeding with the enquiry. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307435