https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307434 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by three accused individuals challenging their conviction and sentence in a murder case. The Court upheld the High Court's decision based on reliable eyewitness testimony, finding no grounds to interfere. Subsequently, the Court clarified that the constitutional validity discussion of rules empowering summary dismissal did not extend to Section 384 of the CrPC. The Court emphasized that the specific challenge to Section 384 was not raised, affirming the summary dismissal of the appeal based on the circumstances and arguments presented in this case. en-us Wed, 05 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:07:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307434 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by three accused individuals challenging their conviction and sentence in a murder case. The Court upheld the High Court's decision based on reliable eyewitness testimony, finding no grounds to interfere. Subsequently, the Court clarified that the constitutional validity discussion of rules empowering summary dismissal did not extend to Section 384 of the CrPC. The Court emphasized that the specific challenge to Section 384 was not raised, affirming the summary dismissal of the appeal based on the circumstances and arguments presented in this case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307434