https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307434 The SC found no sufficient ground to interfere with the High Court's reversal of acquittal and restored conviction, since the principal eyewitness testimony had been accepted as trustworthy after detailed scrutiny and the trial court's reasons for rejecting it were found unacceptable. On independent examination of the record, the Court held that the evidence did not justify disturbance of the High Court's view, and the appeal was summarily dismissed. The Court also noted that any observation on the ultra vires question concerning Section 384 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 would not be binding because the issue had neither been raised nor argued. en-us Wed, 05 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:07:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307434 The SC found no sufficient ground to interfere with the High Court's reversal of acquittal and restored conviction, since the principal eyewitness testimony had been accepted as trustworthy after detailed scrutiny and the trial court's reasons for rejecting it were found unacceptable. On independent examination of the record, the Court held that the evidence did not justify disturbance of the High Court's view, and the appeal was summarily dismissed. The Court also noted that any observation on the ultra vires question concerning Section 384 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 would not be binding because the issue had neither been raised nor argued. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Dec 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307434