<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (8) TMI 63 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307433</link>
    <description>The court dismissed all writ petitions, affirming the validity of levying octroi duty on toddy and sendhi under the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1956. It held that the Act was within the legislative competence, and the imposition of octroi duty on goods entering the city was lawful. The court emphasized the availability of alternative remedies under Section 282 of the Act for addressing concerns regarding the calculation of octroi duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 12:01:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (8) TMI 63 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307433</link>
      <description>The court dismissed all writ petitions, affirming the validity of levying octroi duty on toddy and sendhi under the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1956. It held that the Act was within the legislative competence, and the imposition of octroi duty on goods entering the city was lawful. The court emphasized the availability of alternative remedies under Section 282 of the Act for addressing concerns regarding the calculation of octroi duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>