https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307431 The Court invalidated the cess imposed on the Petitioner-company post-1950, ruling that the Darbar Order was an executive order and not a law, contravening Article 265 of the Constitution. The Court held that the cess was discriminatory, violating Article 14, but did not impede the Petitioner's right under Article 19(1)(g). Consequently, the State was restrained from collecting the cess from the Petitioner after 26-1-1950 and was directed to pay the Petitioner-company costs amounting to Rs. 150. en-us Fri, 07 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Apr 2023 11:10:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307431 The Court invalidated the cess imposed on the Petitioner-company post-1950, ruling that the Darbar Order was an executive order and not a law, contravening Article 265 of the Constitution. The Court held that the cess was discriminatory, violating Article 14, but did not impede the Petitioner's right under Article 19(1)(g). Consequently, the State was restrained from collecting the cess from the Petitioner after 26-1-1950 and was directed to pay the Petitioner-company costs amounting to Rs. 150. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307431