https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307430 The Division Bench dismissed the Habeas Corpus petition, finding the arrest lawful and compliant with constitutional provisions and the CrPC. The court rejected the request for a certificate to appeal to the Supreme Court, stating that the raised legal questions did not warrant intervention as they were settled by higher courts. The judgment emphasized that the procedure for pronouncing judgment was proper, and the petitioner faced no prejudice. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, and the application for a certificate for appeal was rejected due to the lack of substantial legal questions necessitating Supreme Court intervention. en-us Fri, 29 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Apr 2023 10:33:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307430 The Division Bench dismissed the Habeas Corpus petition, finding the arrest lawful and compliant with constitutional provisions and the CrPC. The court rejected the request for a certificate to appeal to the Supreme Court, stating that the raised legal questions did not warrant intervention as they were settled by higher courts. The judgment emphasized that the procedure for pronouncing judgment was proper, and the petitioner faced no prejudice. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, and the application for a certificate for appeal was rejected due to the lack of substantial legal questions necessitating Supreme Court intervention. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307430