<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1948 (12) TMI 13 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307429</link>
    <description>A certificate under Section 205 of the Government of India Act, 1935 lies only where a substantial question of law as to interpretation of the Act is actually involved in the case, not where a new constitutional point is raised for the first time in the certificate application. A question must be necessary to the decision, and a hypothetical or belated contention cannot create certification jurisdiction. On sanction under Section 270, the provision applies only to acts done or purported to be done in discharge of official duty; alleged participation in unlawful assembly, rioting, and grievous hurt did not meet that test, so no prior sanction was required and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 1948 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 10:30:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1948 (12) TMI 13 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307429</link>
      <description>A certificate under Section 205 of the Government of India Act, 1935 lies only where a substantial question of law as to interpretation of the Act is actually involved in the case, not where a new constitutional point is raised for the first time in the certificate application. A question must be necessary to the decision, and a hypothetical or belated contention cannot create certification jurisdiction. On sanction under Section 270, the provision applies only to acts done or purported to be done in discharge of official duty; alleged participation in unlawful assembly, rioting, and grievous hurt did not meet that test, so no prior sanction was required and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 1948 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>