https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307426 Section 319 CrPC confers an extraordinary, discretionary power that must be exercised sparingly on strong and cogent evidence. The High Court erred by refusing to test the summoning order on merits merely because later proceedings under Section 446 CrPC had been initiated; subsequent proceedings could not validate an order that was itself open to challenge or prevent scrutiny of its correctness. The appellant's claim of juvenile status also required consideration. The refusal to examine the summoning order and the dismissal of the revision were therefore unsustainable. en-us Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:01:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307426 Section 319 CrPC confers an extraordinary, discretionary power that must be exercised sparingly on strong and cogent evidence. The High Court erred by refusing to test the summoning order on merits merely because later proceedings under Section 446 CrPC had been initiated; subsequent proceedings could not validate an order that was itself open to challenge or prevent scrutiny of its correctness. The appellant's claim of juvenile status also required consideration. The refusal to examine the summoning order and the dismissal of the revision were therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307426