<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 497 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436471</link>
    <description>The Allahabad HC quashed both the adjudicating authority&#039;s and appellate authority&#039;s orders regarding GST demand and penalty assessment. The court found that the authorities improperly applied Section 74 of the GST Act without establishing essential elements including fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts. The adjudicating authority erroneously relied on Income Tax guidelines for GST liability determination, while the appellate authority failed to provide any reasoning for tax quantification despite criticizing the lower authority&#039;s methodology. The demand assessment was deemed non-compliant with Section 74 mandates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 497 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436471</link>
      <description>The Allahabad HC quashed both the adjudicating authority&#039;s and appellate authority&#039;s orders regarding GST demand and penalty assessment. The court found that the authorities improperly applied Section 74 of the GST Act without establishing essential elements including fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts. The adjudicating authority erroneously relied on Income Tax guidelines for GST liability determination, while the appellate authority failed to provide any reasoning for tax quantification despite criticizing the lower authority&#039;s methodology. The demand assessment was deemed non-compliant with Section 74 mandates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>