<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 490 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436464</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the petition, quashing the order directing payment of a disputed amount and instructing reconsideration by the first respondent. The petitioner, as Secretary of an educational trust and an assessee, was granted a hearing opportunity with a stay on precipitative action. The Court emphasized the need for a clear opinion on the abatement issue under Sections 153A and 153C of the Income Tax Act before granting a stay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:01:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 490 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436464</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the petition, quashing the order directing payment of a disputed amount and instructing reconsideration by the first respondent. The petitioner, as Secretary of an educational trust and an assessee, was granted a hearing opportunity with a stay on precipitative action. The Court emphasized the need for a clear opinion on the abatement issue under Sections 153A and 153C of the Income Tax Act before granting a stay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>