<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 478 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436452</link>
    <description>The court denied bail to the petitioner, emphasizing the substantial evidence of large-scale illegal mining and money laundering activities. The court found a prima facie case against the petitioner, highlighting ongoing investigations into multiple offences, including those under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Despite health grounds raised by the petitioner, the court ruled against bail due to the gravity of the allegations and the petitioner&#039;s significant involvement in illegal activities. The court directed jail authorities to provide necessary medical treatment to the petitioner but maintained the denial of bail based on the seriousness of the charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:00:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 478 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436452</link>
      <description>The court denied bail to the petitioner, emphasizing the substantial evidence of large-scale illegal mining and money laundering activities. The court found a prima facie case against the petitioner, highlighting ongoing investigations into multiple offences, including those under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Despite health grounds raised by the petitioner, the court ruled against bail due to the gravity of the allegations and the petitioner&#039;s significant involvement in illegal activities. The court directed jail authorities to provide necessary medical treatment to the petitioner but maintained the denial of bail based on the seriousness of the charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>