https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436451 The Supreme Court held that Section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1963, does not apply to the 30-day condonable period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act. Additionally, Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, is not applicable to the condonable period as it is governed by the Limitation Act. The Court affirmed the lower courts' decisions, refusing to condone the delay in filing the application under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, emphasizing that the prescribed period is strictly three months without any extension beyond the 30-day period. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed. en-us Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:00:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436451 The Supreme Court held that Section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1963, does not apply to the 30-day condonable period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act. Additionally, Section 10 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, is not applicable to the condonable period as it is governed by the Limitation Act. The Court affirmed the lower courts' decisions, refusing to condone the delay in filing the application under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, emphasizing that the prescribed period is strictly three months without any extension beyond the 30-day period. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436451