https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436450 The High Court set aside the Trial Court's order rejecting the plaint under Order VII, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, allowing the appeal suit for declaration, permanent injunction, and recovery of possession to proceed. The Court emphasized the need to adjudicate the issues raised between the parties on merits and clarified that a plaint should not be rejected on merits in an Interlocutory Application. The distinction between "no cause of action" and "does not disclose a cause of action" was highlighted, indicating that a plaint may be rejected if the cause of action is not properly disclosed, allowing the plaintiff to file a fresh suit with corrections. en-us Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:00:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436450 The High Court set aside the Trial Court's order rejecting the plaint under Order VII, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, allowing the appeal suit for declaration, permanent injunction, and recovery of possession to proceed. The Court emphasized the need to adjudicate the issues raised between the parties on merits and clarified that a plaint should not be rejected on merits in an Interlocutory Application. The distinction between "no cause of action" and "does not disclose a cause of action" was highlighted, indicating that a plaint may be rejected if the cause of action is not properly disclosed, allowing the plaintiff to file a fresh suit with corrections. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436450