https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436425 The court dismissed the appeal against the rejection of the Appellant's impleadment in an oppression and mismanagement petition concerning Respondent No. 3. The court upheld the decision that the Appellant, removed as a nominee director by the nominating group, could not claim to represent their interests. Additionally, the Appellant's shareholding transfer rendered her shareholding status irrelevant to the proceedings. Consequently, the court found no valid reason for the Appellant to be impleaded in the dispute and dismissed the appeal and related applications. en-us Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Apr 2023 07:58:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436425 The court dismissed the appeal against the rejection of the Appellant's impleadment in an oppression and mismanagement petition concerning Respondent No. 3. The court upheld the decision that the Appellant, removed as a nominee director by the nominating group, could not claim to represent their interests. Additionally, the Appellant's shareholding transfer rendered her shareholding status irrelevant to the proceedings. Consequently, the court found no valid reason for the Appellant to be impleaded in the dispute and dismissed the appeal and related applications. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436425