<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 450 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436424</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Tribunal, dismissing the Appeal as lacking merit. The Petition was deemed not filed within the limitation period, and the purported transfer of shares did not comply with the Companies Act and Articles of Association. The alleged consideration for the shares was not validated, and the share certificates were found to be fabricated. The Appellants failed to prove their case, making the Petition not maintainable. The Appeal was dismissed, as the Appellants did not establish their entitlement to the shares or payment of consideration, lacking the locus to file under the Companies Act, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 07:58:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 450 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436424</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Tribunal, dismissing the Appeal as lacking merit. The Petition was deemed not filed within the limitation period, and the purported transfer of shares did not comply with the Companies Act and Articles of Association. The alleged consideration for the shares was not validated, and the share certificates were found to be fabricated. The Appellants failed to prove their case, making the Petition not maintainable. The Appeal was dismissed, as the Appellants did not establish their entitlement to the shares or payment of consideration, lacking the locus to file under the Companies Act, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>