<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 448 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436422</link>
    <description>Debenture holders were treated as financial creditors where the debenture issue was for raising debt, the trust deed and guarantee recognized payment obligations, and the corporate debtor signed as co-obligor and executed an unconditional guarantee. The transaction structure made the guarantors jointly and severally liable on demand, so enforcement was not confined to the trustee. On default, the demand certificate triggered the payment obligation under the transaction documents, establishing debt and default for insolvency purposes. The amount payable was therefore financial debt, and the section 7 application satisfied the threshold for admission. The admission of insolvency proceedings against the corporate debtor was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 07:58:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 448 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436422</link>
      <description>Debenture holders were treated as financial creditors where the debenture issue was for raising debt, the trust deed and guarantee recognized payment obligations, and the corporate debtor signed as co-obligor and executed an unconditional guarantee. The transaction structure made the guarantors jointly and severally liable on demand, so enforcement was not confined to the trustee. On default, the demand certificate triggered the payment obligation under the transaction documents, establishing debt and default for insolvency purposes. The amount payable was therefore financial debt, and the section 7 application satisfied the threshold for admission. The admission of insolvency proceedings against the corporate debtor was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>