<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 444 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436418</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the initiation of proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. It held that the total value involved in the case, considering all individuals, exceeded the minimum threshold amount required by the Act. The court emphasized that further investigation was necessary as the full extent of money laundering allegations involving multiple accused was yet to be revealed. Therefore, it concluded that the petitioner&#039;s argument regarding the scheduled offence&#039;s value being insufficient was premature, and any decision on the threshold limit would await trial proceedings and additional investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 07:58:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 444 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436418</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the initiation of proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. It held that the total value involved in the case, considering all individuals, exceeded the minimum threshold amount required by the Act. The court emphasized that further investigation was necessary as the full extent of money laundering allegations involving multiple accused was yet to be revealed. Therefore, it concluded that the petitioner&#039;s argument regarding the scheduled offence&#039;s value being insufficient was premature, and any decision on the threshold limit would await trial proceedings and additional investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>