<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 442 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436416</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled that &quot;Hair Transplantation&quot; qualifies as a cosmetic surgery service subject to service tax. The Tribunal rejected the argument that it falls under the exclusion clause for surgeries addressing congenital defects, emphasizing its cosmetic nature to enhance appearance rather than restore anatomy. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the tax liability on Hair Transplantation services, dismissing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 07:58:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 442 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436416</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled that &quot;Hair Transplantation&quot; qualifies as a cosmetic surgery service subject to service tax. The Tribunal rejected the argument that it falls under the exclusion clause for surgeries addressing congenital defects, emphasizing its cosmetic nature to enhance appearance rather than restore anatomy. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the tax liability on Hair Transplantation services, dismissing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>