<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 437 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436411</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating authority for fresh consideration after finding the issue involved a mixed question of fact and law regarding the proper determination of Service tax liability on the rebate/concession granted by the Appellant. The Tribunal directed a reconsideration in light of a previous judgment and the corresponding facts, allowing the appeals by way of remand for further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 437 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436411</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating authority for fresh consideration after finding the issue involved a mixed question of fact and law regarding the proper determination of Service tax liability on the rebate/concession granted by the Appellant. The Tribunal directed a reconsideration in light of a previous judgment and the corresponding facts, allowing the appeals by way of remand for further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>