<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 432 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436406</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the demand for Service Tax under &#039;works contract&#039; service for the period from October 2007 to April 2010 was not sustainable based on the legal position established by previous decisions. The impugned order demanding Service Tax was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2023 07:57:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 432 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436406</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the demand for Service Tax under &#039;works contract&#039; service for the period from October 2007 to April 2010 was not sustainable based on the legal position established by previous decisions. The impugned order demanding Service Tax was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential benefits as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>