<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 430 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436404</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the assessee complied with Rule 6(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 by taking only 85% credit on common input services without maintaining separate accounts for dutiable and exempted goods. The assessee submitted a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate detailing input usage and credit taken, which the Commissioner accepted as sufficient compliance. The revenue failed to provide evidence challenging the correctness of the credit calculations or propose alternative computations. Consequently, demands raised against the assessee were dropped, and the appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2025 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 430 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436404</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the assessee complied with Rule 6(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 by taking only 85% credit on common input services without maintaining separate accounts for dutiable and exempted goods. The assessee submitted a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate detailing input usage and credit taken, which the Commissioner accepted as sufficient compliance. The revenue failed to provide evidence challenging the correctness of the credit calculations or propose alternative computations. Consequently, demands raised against the assessee were dropped, and the appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>