<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>investigation u/s 67</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118477</link>
    <description>Search and seizure under GST requires proper authorisation and reasons to believe goods are liable for confiscation. State authorities can undertake intelligence based enforcement and summon past books even if central authorities previously audited the same periods; taxpayers should check overlap with prior audits and invoke statutory protections to resist duplicative proceedings while noting limitation periods for production of records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:41:19 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>investigation u/s 67</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118477</link>
      <description>Search and seizure under GST requires proper authorisation and reasons to believe goods are liable for confiscation. State authorities can undertake intelligence based enforcement and summon past books even if central authorities previously audited the same periods; taxpayers should check overlap with prior audits and invoke statutory protections to resist duplicative proceedings while noting limitation periods for production of records.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:41:19 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>