<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 424 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436398</link>
    <description>HC reviewed a tax refund dispute involving export services. The court found procedural irregularities in the original refund rejection, including unaddressed documentation discrepancies and classification issues. HC set aside previous orders and directed the tax authority to conduct a fresh assessment, providing the petitioner full opportunity to explain service details and substantiate the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 424 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436398</link>
      <description>HC reviewed a tax refund dispute involving export services. The court found procedural irregularities in the original refund rejection, including unaddressed documentation discrepancies and classification issues. HC set aside previous orders and directed the tax authority to conduct a fresh assessment, providing the petitioner full opportunity to explain service details and substantiate the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>