<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 422 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436396</link>
    <description>HC analyzed a challenge to National Anti-Profiteering Authority&#039;s order regarding Input Tax Credit non-transfer to flat buyers. Court issued notice to respondents and restrained further investigations and penalties. Petitioner disputed quantification methodology, highlighting limited buyer response. Interim relief granted, with matter listed for subsequent hearing, effectively pausing punitive actions against the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 422 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436396</link>
      <description>HC analyzed a challenge to National Anti-Profiteering Authority&#039;s order regarding Input Tax Credit non-transfer to flat buyers. Court issued notice to respondents and restrained further investigations and penalties. Petitioner disputed quantification methodology, highlighting limited buyer response. Interim relief granted, with matter listed for subsequent hearing, effectively pausing punitive actions against the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>