<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 414 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436388</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the directions in paragraph 49 of the impugned order but deleted paragraph 50. The appeal was dismissed, and the reliefs claimed by the Appellants were not granted. The CoC cannot alter the liquidation value determined by Registered Valuers, as it serves a specific purpose in the resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 22:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 414 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436388</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the directions in paragraph 49 of the impugned order but deleted paragraph 50. The appeal was dismissed, and the reliefs claimed by the Appellants were not granted. The CoC cannot alter the liquidation value determined by Registered Valuers, as it serves a specific purpose in the resolution process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>