https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436385 The court upheld the order framing charges against petitioner No.2 under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, finding prima facie evidence of her involvement in activities connected with proceeds of a scheduled crime. The court rejected arguments that the charges were unsustainable due to the nature of the offenses and clarified that the prosecution under PMLA is independent of prosecution for the scheduled offense. The court dismissed the petition, affirming the legality of the order and the sufficiency of evidence against petitioner No.2 for the alleged money laundering offense. en-us Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:24:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436385 The court upheld the order framing charges against petitioner No.2 under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, finding prima facie evidence of her involvement in activities connected with proceeds of a scheduled crime. The court rejected arguments that the charges were unsustainable due to the nature of the offenses and clarified that the prosecution under PMLA is independent of prosecution for the scheduled offense. The court dismissed the petition, affirming the legality of the order and the sufficiency of evidence against petitioner No.2 for the alleged money laundering offense. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436385