https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436381 The appeals challenging an order were dismissed as withdrawn, raising questions on their maintainability. The appellant sought to demonstrate goods movement pre-order. The respondent argued citing legal precedent that without liberty to file a fresh appeal, the present appeals are not maintainable. The Supreme Court highlighted preclusion from challenging an order if a special leave petition is withdrawn without reserving liberty to file afresh. Legal precedents emphasized that appeals under Article 136 are not maintainable against an order rejecting review. The court dismissed the appeals, stating that repeated appeals against the same order are impermissible once the remedy is exhausted by withdrawing the appeal without reserving liberty. en-us Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:23:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436381 The appeals challenging an order were dismissed as withdrawn, raising questions on their maintainability. The appellant sought to demonstrate goods movement pre-order. The respondent argued citing legal precedent that without liberty to file a fresh appeal, the present appeals are not maintainable. The Supreme Court highlighted preclusion from challenging an order if a special leave petition is withdrawn without reserving liberty to file afresh. Legal precedents emphasized that appeals under Article 136 are not maintainable against an order rejecting review. The court dismissed the appeals, stating that repeated appeals against the same order are impermissible once the remedy is exhausted by withdrawing the appeal without reserving liberty. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436381