https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307403 The Supreme Court set aside the orders of the Delhi High Court and Additional District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in a case concerning non-service of notice to the appellant. The Court held that the appellant was not properly informed of the proceedings transfer and dates, as required by Rule 6 Chapter 13. Due to the lack of notice and opportunity to participate, the ex-parte decree against the appellant was unjustified. The Court allowed the appellant's application under Order IX Rule 13, emphasizing the mandatory nature of informing all parties of transfers and appearance dates. en-us Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:55:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307403 The Supreme Court set aside the orders of the Delhi High Court and Additional District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in a case concerning non-service of notice to the appellant. The Court held that the appellant was not properly informed of the proceedings transfer and dates, as required by Rule 6 Chapter 13. Due to the lack of notice and opportunity to participate, the ex-parte decree against the appellant was unjustified. The Court allowed the appellant's application under Order IX Rule 13, emphasizing the mandatory nature of informing all parties of transfers and appearance dates. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307403