https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307401 The court upheld the dismissal of the appellant's application to set aside an ex-parte decree dated 21.2.2006, citing the appellant's negligence and lack of bona fide in pursuing the case. The court found no "sufficient cause" for non-appearance under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC and rejected the appellant's request for condonation of delay in filing the application. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the learned Single Judge's decision, with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 01 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307401 The court upheld the dismissal of the appellant's application to set aside an ex-parte decree dated 21.2.2006, citing the appellant's negligence and lack of bona fide in pursuing the case. The court found no "sufficient cause" for non-appearance under Order 9 Rule 13 of CPC and rejected the appellant's request for condonation of delay in filing the application. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the learned Single Judge's decision, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307401