<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 959 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307400</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application for re-hearing of a motor vehicle accident compensation case, upholding the compensation amount to be paid by the vehicle owner, not the Insurance Company. The claimants, who became major during the appeal, were bound by the judgment as they did not elect to proceed as major parties. The court found no error in the original judgment and awarded no costs to any party involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 959 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307400</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application for re-hearing of a motor vehicle accident compensation case, upholding the compensation amount to be paid by the vehicle owner, not the Insurance Company. The claimants, who became major during the appeal, were bound by the judgment as they did not elect to proceed as major parties. The court found no error in the original judgment and awarded no costs to any party involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>