<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 89 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32395</link>
    <description>Credit of service tax on mobile phone services was held admissible where the phones stood in the company&#039;s name and were used by employees for work connected with manufacture of final products. The Board&#039;s circular and prior decisions supported the view that input service credit is available when the service is used in or in relation to manufacture, and incidental personal use does not by itself defeat eligibility. On the facts, the phones were treated as company phones used for business purposes, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 89 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32395</link>
      <description>Credit of service tax on mobile phone services was held admissible where the phones stood in the company&#039;s name and were used by employees for work connected with manufacture of final products. The Board&#039;s circular and prior decisions supported the view that input service credit is available when the service is used in or in relation to manufacture, and incidental personal use does not by itself defeat eligibility. On the facts, the phones were treated as company phones used for business purposes, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>