<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 87 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32393</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the classification of services related to storage and warehousing/cargo handling. The appellant&#039;s activities were contested by the tax department, leading to a demand notice for service tax, penalties, and interest. The Tribunal found that the lack of clarity in specifying the service category in the notice and the ambiguity in categorizing the taxable service were fundamental flaws. As a result, the impugned order was set aside in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 87 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32393</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the classification of services related to storage and warehousing/cargo handling. The appellant&#039;s activities were contested by the tax department, leading to a demand notice for service tax, penalties, and interest. The Tribunal found that the lack of clarity in specifying the service category in the notice and the ambiguity in categorizing the taxable service were fundamental flaws. As a result, the impugned order was set aside in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>