<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Extended Limitation Period in Service Tax Case: Bona Fide Belief &amp; Sub-Contractor Liability Examined u/s.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69156</link>
    <description>Suppression of facts or not - extended period of limitation - There is a reason for a bona fide belief in such arrangement regarding non-liability of sub-contractor when the main contractor is liable to discharge full service tax. Though the said principle is not applicable against the tax liability but the question of invoking extended period is to be answered in favour of the appellant. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 09:09:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 09:09:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Extended Limitation Period in Service Tax Case: Bona Fide Belief &amp; Sub-Contractor Liability Examined u/s.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69156</link>
      <description>Suppression of facts or not - extended period of limitation - There is a reason for a bona fide belief in such arrangement regarding non-liability of sub-contractor when the main contractor is liable to discharge full service tax. Though the said principle is not applicable against the tax liability but the question of invoking extended period is to be answered in favour of the appellant. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 09:09:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=69156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>