<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 345 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436319</link>
    <description>Abatement exemption under Notification No. 01/2006-ST was treated as available where Cenvat credit had been taken but later reversed. The operative reasoning was that reversal of the credit restores compliance with the notification condition requiring non-availment of Cenvat credit. A contrary view based on an earlier High Court decision was not accepted because the Supreme Court authority on the same issue was followed. On that basis, the assessee was held entitled to the abatement exemption and the demand was dropped.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 09:09:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 345 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436319</link>
      <description>Abatement exemption under Notification No. 01/2006-ST was treated as available where Cenvat credit had been taken but later reversed. The operative reasoning was that reversal of the credit restores compliance with the notification condition requiring non-availment of Cenvat credit. A contrary view based on an earlier High Court decision was not accepted because the Supreme Court authority on the same issue was followed. On that basis, the assessee was held entitled to the abatement exemption and the demand was dropped.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>