<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 2074 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307390</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the late fee under section 234E is not applicable for the period before 1.6.2015. The Tribunal also held that the delay in filing the appeals should be condoned due to the legal position favoring the assessee. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the orders confirming the late fee were deemed void. The judgment was pronounced on 15th February 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 22:12:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 2074 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307390</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the late fee under section 234E is not applicable for the period before 1.6.2015. The Tribunal also held that the delay in filing the appeals should be condoned due to the legal position favoring the assessee. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the orders confirming the late fee were deemed void. The judgment was pronounced on 15th February 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>