https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307384 Bail under Sections 437 and 439 CrPC was refused in view of the gravity of the alleged economic offences and the incomplete stage of investigation. The court held that the magnitude of the allegations, together with the real possibility of influencing witnesses, tampering with evidence, or otherwise obstructing the inquiry, justified denial of release at that stage. It further held that the petitioner's claim to personal liberty could not override public interest where the alleged conduct involved substantial public harm and the investigation remained ongoing. en-us Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:14:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307384 Bail under Sections 437 and 439 CrPC was refused in view of the gravity of the alleged economic offences and the incomplete stage of investigation. The court held that the magnitude of the allegations, together with the real possibility of influencing witnesses, tampering with evidence, or otherwise obstructing the inquiry, justified denial of release at that stage. It further held that the petitioner's claim to personal liberty could not override public interest where the alleged conduct involved substantial public harm and the investigation remained ongoing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307384