<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 336 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436310</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment framed under section 143(3) was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had conducted sufficient inquiries and considered the evidence before accepting the bad debt claim. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the revisional order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 08:56:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 336 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436310</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment framed under section 143(3) was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had conducted sufficient inquiries and considered the evidence before accepting the bad debt claim. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the revisional order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>