<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 335 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436309</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the property was sold by the partnership firm, not the individual assessee or the proprietary firm. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) did not consider this, leading to an incorrect addition to the income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 08:56:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 335 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436309</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the property was sold by the partnership firm, not the individual assessee or the proprietary firm. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) did not consider this, leading to an incorrect addition to the income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>