<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 330 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436304</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) vacated the penalty of Rs.10,95,149/- imposed by the Assessing Officer (A.O) under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This decision was made as the basis for the penalty was found to be invalid, leading to the appeal of the assessee being allowed. The Tribunal also vacated additions made under sections 68 and 56(2)(viib) of the Act, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2023 16:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=710242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 330 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436304</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) vacated the penalty of Rs.10,95,149/- imposed by the Assessing Officer (A.O) under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This decision was made as the basis for the penalty was found to be invalid, leading to the appeal of the assessee being allowed. The Tribunal also vacated additions made under sections 68 and 56(2)(viib) of the Act, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=436304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>